Campaign position · Updated October 4, 2026

Administrators covering classrooms

I support implementing a Katy ISD policy in which administrators and qualified district staff cover classrooms when teachers are out, reducing avoidable substitute costs and keeping decision makers connected to the classroom.

The issue

Teacher absences are unavoidable, and substitute costs add up quickly. Katy ISD previously used administrator classroom coverage, and I support restoring a structured version of that idea. Other Texas districts provide useful models: El Paso ISD now requires salaried central-office employees to provide classroom substitute coverage as part of a formal cost-saving effort, while Dallas ISD has a documented history of central staff stepping into classrooms when campuses need coverage. Katy ISD should build a policy that fits the district rather than copy another district word-for-word.

Why it matters in Katy ISD

Every avoidable substitute expense is a dollar that cannot be used for other classroom priorities. Just as important, when district-level decision makers spend time in real classrooms, they gain firsthand perspective on how policies, staffing decisions, and systems affect teachers and students.

What the Board controls

The Board can adopt policy, approve the budget, request analysis and public reporting, and direct the superintendent through the Board's collective authority. Administration should then design and manage the day-to-day implementation within those Board-approved expectations.

My approach

I support implementing an administrator and qualified district-staff classroom-coverage policy in Katy ISD. The question is not whether I would explore the concept; the implementation questions are how many required coverage days make sense, which administrators and district staff are appropriately qualified to participate, how campus needs should trigger assignments, and how the district should measure savings, fill rates, and instructional quality. Those details should be set using district data and the superintendent's recommendations.

What I would ask and measure

  • How many classroom-coverage days per semester or year eligible central-office employees should complete
  • Which roles should be included: superintendent cabinet, assistant superintendents, directors, coordinators, instructional specialists, other credentialed staff, and/or other qualified salaried employees
  • Which roles need exemptions because leaving their normal duty would create safety, compliance, operational, or service-delivery problems
  • What minimum training, background, certification, or classroom-readiness requirements should apply
  • Whether assignments should be scheduled proactively, triggered only when substitute fill rates fall below a threshold, or use a hybrid model
  • The actual annual cost of short-term substitute coverage that could reasonably be displaced
  • How substitute fill rates, teacher feedback, student continuity, and campus administrative burden change after implementation
  • How much savings, if any, is realized after accounting for training, scheduling, and operational tradeoffs